/ KYB Watch
Regulation

AMLA finalises core EU standards for customer due diligence

AMLA has finalised three draft standards covering customer evidence, linked transactions and group-wide AML controls across the European Union.

AMLA
October 1, 2026
European Union
Analysis by Detelio
Customer records, linked transactions and group controls pass through one standardising framework.

What happened

On 1 October 2026, the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AMLA) published final reports on three sets of draft regulatory technical standards for private-sector entities subject to the EU Anti-Money Laundering Regulation.

The standards address three connected areas: distinguishing business relationships from occasional transactions and identifying linked transactions; the customer information and verification measures required for customer due diligence; and minimum group-wide AML/CFT arrangements, including governance, controls and secure information sharing.

The customer-due-diligence standard specifies information to be collected for customers, representatives and beneficial owners. For legal entities, that includes the legal name and, where different, the trade name. AMLA’s factsheet also states that information from a central beneficial-ownership register may be used in low-risk situations to identify a beneficial owner, but is not sufficient by itself for verification. It must be corroborated with information from the customer or another reliable source.

The final draft also covers non-face-to-face verification, electronic identification, simplified measures in lower-risk situations and screening for sanctions and politically exposed persons. For existing relationships, AMLA describes a risk-sensitive transition: information should be brought into compliance within one year for higher-risk customers and within five years for other customers.

The group-wide standard requires proportionate governance, risk assessment, policies, training, remediation and information-sharing arrangements. Customer, beneficial-ownership, transaction and risk information may need to move across the group on a need-to-know basis through secure and documented channels.

The standards have been submitted to the European Commission. They are not yet definitive: AMLA says they remain subject to review and potential amendment, and are proposed to apply six months after entry into force following adoption and publication in the Official Journal.

Why it matters for KYB teams

These standards move the EU rulebook closer to a common operating specification for customer due diligence. For KYB teams, the practical impact is not simply a longer list of required fields. Systems need to distinguish information that has been collected from information that has actually been verified, and retain the source, date and method behind that verification.

The treatment of beneficial-ownership registers is particularly important. A register can support identification, but AMLA’s final draft does not treat it as sufficient evidence on its own. Workflows need to combine registry records with customer evidence or other reliable sources and preserve discrepancies for review. That makes evidence provenance and source coverage part of the control rather than an implementation detail.

The linked-transaction standard also requires teams to see activity that may be split across time or channels. If separate transactions are assessed only in isolation, a relationship or threshold may never be recognised. Identity resolution and aggregation rules therefore need to connect activity to the same customer, beneficial owner or acting party before the CDD decision is made.

For groups, the challenge is controlled information mobility. Customer and ownership evidence, risk findings and transaction context need to be available to the entities that require them, while access remains limited, secure and documented. A common policy without a workable data-sharing process will not produce a consistent group-wide outcome.

Because the standards are still awaiting Commission adoption, teams should not present the final drafts as already binding. They can, however, use the published reports as a concrete basis for gap analysis and prepare KYB workflows that can be adjusted when the definitive texts and application dates are confirmed.

What teams should review

Teams preparing for the EU’s harmonised customer-due-diligence framework should review the following:

  • Does the data model capture every required customer, representative and beneficial-owner attribute separately?
  • Can reviewers distinguish collected information from verified information and see the source used for each data point?
  • Is beneficial-ownership register data corroborated rather than accepted as sufficient on its own?
  • Can the workflow identify related occasional transactions and aggregate activity across time, channels and accounts?
  • Are sanctions and PEP checks able to use aliases, trade names and relevant wallet addresses where available?
  • Is there a risk-based plan for updating existing customer records within the proposed transitional periods?
  • Can customer, ownership, transaction and risk information be shared securely across the group on a documented need-to-know basis?
  • Are legal impediments to third-country information sharing recorded, escalated and linked to compensating controls?
  • Is regulatory versioning in place so rules can be updated after Commission adoption and Official Journal publication?
AMLA
Regulator
October 1, 2026
Read the official update
Paper airplane icon representing sending an invitation or dispatching a report.

Get new updates occasionally

Important KYB, AML, ownership, monitoring, and enforcement developments

Thanks, you’re subscribed.
Something went wrong. Please try again.
Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
Request a demo