Automate risk scoring for marketplace sellers, partners, and enterprise customers with configurable factors, clear rationale, and audit-ready decision trails.
When scoring is manual or opaque, teams slow down approvals and still miss the riskiest cases
Pull business registry details, UBO ownership, geography, and watchlist signals into one case.
Use configurable factors and weights aligned with your internal risk appetite.
See the exact drivers behind the score, with factor-level breakdowns and rationale.
Auto-approve low risk, route medium to EDD, and escalate high risk for review.
Configurable factors and weights aligned to your policy, risk appetite, and KYB requirements.
Plus industry, adverse media, and historical decisions.
Adjust weights, thresholds, and routing rules for different segments and markets.
Complex chains and missing UBO signals increase risk.
Entity screening and related-party signals, routed by policy.
Country risk, operating regions, and cross-border exposure.
See the exact drivers behind the result with factor-level breakdowns and clear rationale.
See the drivers, weights, and evidence behind every score.
Every decision is timestamped, attributable, and export-ready.
Keep evidence, decisions, and policy changes traceable across every KYB case.
Every decision is timestamped, attributable, and export-ready.
Route cases based on score thresholds so compliance stays in control while ops moves faster.
Auto-approve low risk, trigger EDD for medium, escalate high.
Bring your own data sources, connect your internal systems, and keep evidence attached to every risk decision.
Real questions from compliance teams evaluating Detelio. If something's missing, ask us in the demo — we'd rather over-share.
Yes. Define segment-specific weights, thresholds, and routing rules, then version the policy so every decision is traceable to the policy that produced it.
Bring your own: registries, internal CRM data, watchlist screening results, adverse media, documents, and historical decisions. Connect via API and webhooks, or start with a CSV import for pilots.
Near-matches are treated as signals, not automatic guilt. Route ambiguous cases to review, capture reviewer reason codes, and use allowlists/exceptions where appropriate so the system improves over time.
Use role-based access: only approved admins can change weights or thresholds. Changes are logged and can be gated by review/approval depending on your process.
Yes. Reviewers can override with a required reason and notes, and the final outcome is recorded with the full audit trail.
A policy baseline (factors + thresholds), your preferred data sources, and one integration point (API/webhook) to send outcomes back to your workflow. Then expand coverage and automation step-by-step.
